Wednesday 25 June 2014

The folly of Asian filial piety



Recently my 75 years father fell down and fractured one piece of his backbone. That required treatment in a private hospital because the government’s hospital didn’t offer the latest treatment. My 70 years old mother will start to have dialysis soon because her kidneys have failed. My spinster 73 years old aunty has Parkinsons and requires care. These events have expectedly placed not only financial demand but also substantial demand of time and effort on me. Apart from putting up money I have to also consistently tear myself away from work to attend to my folks 300 km away. They live in Penang and I in K.L. and I am the only child. It’s a vicious cycle, the more I go away from work, the less money I would have for them. Like most old Malaysians they don’t have medical insurance policies.

In contrast, my about 70 years old aunt in the USA has dementia and suffers from age related frailties as well. I hear that the medical van comes to get her from her house, takes her to the hospital for her regular checkups and after that send her home without any fuss on her children. Someone has to pay for all this care and I suspect it is a form of government organised national medical insurance scheme or private medical insurance from a company.


All these got me thinking, that we the children of Asia seems to have a lot of obligations to old people. It’s usually 4 parents (parents of yourself and the spouse) and some occasional aunt or uncle in addition to your own spouse and children.

I think the governments of Asia under the guise of filial-piety have abdicated their responsibility to care for their old people on a wholesale level. I think the Asian people under the unquestioning respect for filial-piety have neglected to set up organised systems to care for their elderly in Asia (with the exception of Japan I think). In fact in the Chinese and Indian cultures, filial-piety is such a sacred word, that to be accused of having none would be blasphemy. To put it simply, Asian governments generally think because of the culture of filial-piety, old people are the responsibility of their children and the state can wash its hands off the problem. And the Asian children don’t dare demand from their governments, systems such as national medical insurance policies and nursing facilities to care for their old because they would then be accused of not having filial-piety. In fact, the first thing an Asian child would be accused of if he dares put his aged parents in a nursing home would be abandonment. In fact if you have read till here I would have committed blasphemy in writing this.

  
However my point is, there is a tremendous hidden cost to Asia itself with all this celebrated filial-piety. Asian children often can’t work because they have to have to run around like a headless chicken to care for so many old people. They often have to take leave from work to care for so many old people. They can’t stop making money at a frenetic pace to care for so many old people. They often have to hold down double or triple jobs to provide for so many old people. They are often drawn to the fastest money making enterprises possible, without much consideration for ethics. They can’t go work at a faraway but well paying job. They don’t train properly for a long time for a job. In some extreme cases children become prostitutes so that parents can have a better life and they think this is a good deed. The 1-2-4 problem in China will soon be epidemic.


In fact creativity and new scientific discoveries which need an environment of unhurried concentration are hard to come by for the Asians, because they have no time to ponder a problem. I put it to you, this is why Asians particularly China have emerged as a great nation of hasty copycats instead of inventor of new things. It takes much less thinking and effort to copy where else it would take years of no financial return to make a new thing. Asian children are so stretched-out under pressure to constantly make money to care for so many old people that they don’t have the luxury to concentrate and make new things. They struggle from hand to mouth, day in day out and all become mediocre, all become traders and business people – professions that don’t need much concentration and dedication. I further say that, this is one of the main reasons why thinkers like Adam Smith, Charles Darwin, Nikola Tesla, Thomas Edison, Marie Curie have not been Asian. If they had been Asians, they would be frantically earning money to support everybody and have no time for new discovery.


So the next time you want to like a heart-wrenching photo of a labourer at a China train station carrying his frail sick mother on his back for a whole day and night while waiting for the train to come, don’t. Know that the system has failed. Know that they both have no choice. Know that they both are victims of circumstances. Know that they are the end result of state neglect camouflaged as filial piety. Know that it is performed at a high cost to the productivity of the nation's prime workforce.

Sunday 30 June 2013

Haze problem - Transform surgical mask into N95 type respirator

This post is for transforming a surgical mask into a N95 type respirator yourself during a period of haze. During a period of haze it is sometimes hard to find N95 type respirators because they have been sold out, not so readily available at the pharmacies or more expensive than the the normal surgical mask.

The normal surgical masks would have some filtration power against airborne particles, although perhaps not as high as the N95.  It's primary function is to block off liquid droplets from getting to you or the person in front of you. The biggest problem a surgical mask cannot be used like a N95 respirator is because it does not seal to the face of the wearer. i.e air is sucked in through the gaps between the mask and the wearer's face (mostly around the cheek bone area).

While observing the surgical masks in action on myself and my friends during the last haze period, I have come out with this simple DIY design modification that lets the the surgical mask sit tightly on the face and seals perhaps as tightly as a N95 respirator. It requires only 2 staples at both ends. I think apart from being cheap it has some design advantage over the N95 respirator as the fit can be adjusted yourself and it would fit a thin face or a small face like a child's better than the bulkier N95. Being of softer material than the N95 it can curve better and hugs the contour of a person's face better. The recommended angle below could be made smaller for smaller faces.